Datacircle

Best LinkedIn Ad Library API in 2026

Last updated:

ScrapeCreators, Adyntel and Brizzox are the best LinkedIn Ad Library API providers in our benchmark. We benchmarked 3 providers. We list all three, ranked by score. For each one, we show its top scoring plan and each part of the plan's score. We rank 23 plans by price. Captapi's $9 monthly plan costs the least per 1,000 ads: $0.045. Captapi charges for each page of results. We count 200 ads on each page to get the $0.045 price.

  1. #1 ScrapeCreators: LinkedIn Ad Library API

    ScrapeCreators, $47 pack

    It returns all 8 key fields we check: Ad type, Run dates, Text, Media, Call to action, Impressions, Targeting, Advertiser.

    Overall score
    53.8
    Price score
    0
    • $ per 1,000 ads: none. The provider's pages give this plan's price, but not how many ads it pays for.
    • $ per 1,000 companies the provider can't find: the provider's pages don't say
    Accuracy score
    95
    Cost to get started score
    82
    • How you pay: a pack you pay first
    • Least to pay before your first result: $47
    Bundle score
    100
    • Also pays for, from the same budget: 199 other calls
    Performance score
    29
    • This call's median time on 31 October 2026, minus the baseline: 5.38 s
    • Brizzox, the fastest benchmarked provider: 1.562 s
    • On 31 October 2026, we sent this provider all 20 companies in our benchmark.
    • This plan scored 0.9542 out of 1 on those 20 companies. That gives this plan an Accuracy score of 95 out of 100.
    Is ScrapeCreators yours? Put this #1 badge on your site.ScrapeCreators: ranked #1 LinkedIn Ad Library API provider by Datacircle

    The badge links to this page. The badge always shows your current rank on this page.

  2. #2 Adyntel: LinkedIn Ad Library API

    Adyntel, top-up from $0.55

    It returns 7 of the 8 key fields we check: Ad type, Run dates, Text, Media, Impressions, Targeting, Advertiser.

    Overall score
    36.3
    Price score
    0
    • $ per 1,000 ads: none. The provider's pages give this plan's price, but not how many ads it pays for.
    • $ per 1,000 companies the provider can't find: the provider's pages don't say
    Accuracy score
    38
    Cost to get started score
    93
    • How you pay: a top-up you pay first
    • Least to pay before your first result: $0.55
    Bundle score
    89
    • Also pays for, from the same budget: Facebook & Instagram Ads · Meta ad search · LinkedIn keyword search · Google ads · TikTok ads and 3 more
    Performance score
    64
    • This call's median time on 31 October 2026, minus the baseline: 2.446 s
    • Brizzox, the fastest benchmarked provider: 1.562 s
    • We scored this provider on 3 of the 20 companies in our benchmark. We sent this provider those 3 companies on 31 October 2026.
    • This plan scored 0.5937 out of 1 on those 3 companies. We trust a score on 3 companies less than a score on all 20. So we lower this plan's Accuracy score to 38 out of 100.

  3. #3 Brizzox: LinkedIn Ad Library API

    Brizzox, $25 monthly

    It returns 3 of the 8 key fields we check: Ad type, Text, Advertiser.

    Overall score
    36.2
    Price score
    0
    • $ per 1,000 ads: none. The provider's pages give this plan's price, but not how many ads it pays for.
    • $ per 1,000 companies the provider can't find: the provider's pages don't say
    Accuracy score
    30
    Cost to get started score
    83
    • How you pay: monthly
    • Least to pay before your first result: $25
    Bundle score
    95
    • Also pays for, from the same budget: Ad Search (TikTok Ad Library) · Ad Details (TikTok Ad Library) · LinkedIn ad details and 15 more
    Performance score
    100
    • This call's median time on 3 November 2026, minus the baseline: 1.562 s
    • Brizzox, the fastest benchmarked provider: 1.562 s
    • We scored this provider on 15 of the 20 companies in our benchmark. We sent this provider those 15 companies on 3 November 2026.
    • This plan scored 0.3156 out of 1 on those 15 companies. We trust a score on 15 companies less than a score on all 20. So we lower this plan's Accuracy score to 30 out of 100.

How we tested

On 31 October and 3 November 2026, we sent 3 providers the same list of 20 companies, or fewer. Each plan's Overall score adds five parts at their weights, scaled to 100. Price and Accuracy weigh 40 each, and Cost to get started, Bundle and Performance weigh 10 each. We score all 3 providers and rank them by their top plan's Overall score.

We haven't benchmarked 14 other LinkedIn Ad Library API providers yet:

The Accuracy score on LinkedIn Ad Library APIs

This score, out of 100, shows how many of a company's ads a call returns. Each call returns the first page of the company's ads. For each company, we count the ads the call returned, out of 10. Some companies have fewer than 10 ads in LinkedIn's Ad Library. For a company with 4 ads, we count out of 4. We also check each ad for the fields we score. LinkedIn publishes some fields, such as dates and impressions, on some ads only. If no provider's answer held a field for a company, we leave that field out for that company. We average the company scores to get the call's score. If the call returned no ad for a company, that company counts as 0. We compare a provider that ran on fewer companies with the other providers on those same companies. A provider can't score higher by running only on easy companies. We lower the score when we test the call on fewer companies than the benchmark has.

Best GTM APIs