People ›Profiles ›LinkedIn API pricing ›LinkedIn profile API pricing ›ReapX on Apify alternatives 26 ReapX on Apify alternatives in 2026 By Wayne Hamadi , founder of Datacircle. Last updated: November 8, 2026 ReapX on Apify alternatives for LinkedIn profile APIs. Bridgly, Fetchin and Mart.dev each cost $1.00 per 1,000 profiles.
LinkedIn profile API alternatives On our ReapX on Apify plan pages , we compare each ReapX on Apify plan with other providers' plans. We list other providers' plans below, cheapest per 1,000 profiles first.
Provider and plan $ per 1,000 profiles Bridgly, $300 pack $1.00 Fetchin, $5,000 monthly, 20 req/s, GET /api/v1/profile, Get Profile $1.00 Mart.dev, $50 pack, Launch, GET /v1/linkedin, Profile $1.00 elis-lab, $79 monthly $1.05 CrustAPI, top-up from $549, $549+ deposit, POST /v1/linkedin/batch, Process a list of LinkedIn URLs, refresh $1.10 OutX.ai, $99 monthly $1.10 KonbiniAPI, $499 monthly $1.11 Scrapingdog, $300,000 yearly $1.14 TrueScrape, $25 pack $1.25 Up2Data, $12,500 pack, 10M, POST /v1/profiles/enrich, Enrich a profile $1.25 Anysite, $549 monthly, Pro, POST /api/linkedin/user, /linkedin/user $1.29 FetchGoblin, top-up from $100 $1.42 SaleLeads, $499 monthly $1.43 RouterGrowth, $499 monthly, Scale, POST /v1/run, LinkedIn profile $1.51 Axiom Works on Apify, $19 monthly $1.53 Piloterr, $10,788 yearly $1.70 ScrapeAI on Apify, $10,788 yearly $1.71 PhantomBuster, $69 monthly $1.73 Apify user freshdata (not FreshData), $1 pack not published Artificially on Apify, $1 pack not published Captain Data, contact us, Custom rates (pilot, annual commit or volume pricing), GET /people/enrich, Enrich People not published Generect, contact us, Enterprise, POST /api/v1/enrich/realtime/lead/, Enrich lead in realtime not published Mindcase, contact us not published ScrapingDaddy, contact us not published Thirdwatch on Apify, $1 pack not published UnAPI, top-up, Beta Invite-Only Access, POST /users/batch not published
Compare every LinkedIn profile API plan: LinkedIn profile API pricing: free and cheapest plans compared