Datacircle

B2B data accuracy: 3,000 people checked against LinkedIn

How many people in a B2B dataset still work where it says, with the title it says? We drew 3,000 people at random from Datacircle's US dataset (the snapshot of 2026-10-04, 43.6M people) and looked each one up on LinkedIn on 2026-10-08.

88% have the same company and the same title on LinkedIn (95% CI: 86% to 89%), and 93% the same current company. Every number below is a count, and they are all on GitHub as CSV.

The result

The US dataset against LinkedIn, 3,000 people, 2026-10-08
Against LinkedInShare95% CICount
Same company and same title88%86% to 89%2,628 of 3,000
Same current company93%92% to 93%2,776 of 3,000
LinkedIn URL still works97%96% to 97%2,901 of 3,000

Where the other 12% are

Each person of the sample, by what LinkedIn shows
What LinkedIn showsShareCount
Same company, same title88%2,628
Same company, different title5%148
Different company1%34
We have a company, LinkedIn has none3%91
LinkedIn URL dead (profile gone or renamed)3%99

Of the 148 different titles, 36 differ only in wording (one holds the other, or punctuation), 29 are the company's name in our title, and 83 are another title.

By file, and by how old the profile is

Same company and title, by file and by the profile's last update
GroupSame company and title95% CICount
In the 10M+ file88%85% to 90%585 of 665
In the 50M+ file only87%86% to 89%2,043 of 2,335
Updated 0 to 30 days before the snapshot75%71% to 79%299 of 399
Updated 30 to 90 days before87%84% to 90%512 of 590
Updated 90 to 180 days before92%91% to 94%1,761 of 1,906
Updated 180+ days before53%44% to 63%56 of 105

A profile last updated 180 days or more before the snapshot has the same company and title 53% of the time, against 92% at 90 to 180 days. 105 of the 3,000 people drawn are that old: their profiles were updated 104 days before the snapshot on average (median 123). The 10M+ file and the rest of the 50M+ file match alike.

Field by field, on the 2,901 profiles LinkedIn still has

Fields equal to LinkedIn's
FieldSame as LinkedIn95% CICount
First name97%96% to 98%2,816 of 2,901
Last name95%94% to 96%2,757 of 2,901
Headline92%91% to 93%2,662 of 2,901
Still in the US100%100% to 100%2,901 of 2,901
State, where LinkedIn names one100%100% to 100%2,532 of 2,536
Current job's start month, same company94%93% to 95%1,455 of 1,552

Emails: not judged

27% of the people drawn have an email, verified 26 days before the snapshot on average. LinkedIn doesn't show emails, so this benchmark doesn't judge them.

How it was taken

  • Sample: 3,000 people drawn at random from the 50M+ file's people; 665 of them are also in the 10M+ file.
  • Reference: each person's LinkedIn profile, asked by LinkedIn URL on 2026-10-08 through a LinkedIn profile API that fetches the profile from LinkedIn again when its copy is stale. Its answers were 2 days old on average when asked (median 0); 91% had been fetched from LinkedIn within the week.
  • Same company: our current company is LinkedIn's current company.
  • Same title: the two titles are equal once normalized (case, punctuation, accents, the spacing around & and /).
  • 95% CI: the 95% confidence interval of each share.
  • No person is named here: only counts.

The same benchmark, with every number as CSV, under CC BY 4.0: github.com/waynehamadi/datacircle.

The data, and a profile as it is today

The 10M+ file is the free US B2B leads dataset, every column with its fill rate. To read a person's profile as it is today rather than as the file has it: Right now we have 2 live LinkedIn profile APIs that we trust: Up2Data and HarvestAPI. Live. Each request goes to the provider and gets the profile as it is today. See the LinkedIn profile API.

Questions

How accurate is B2B contact data?

In our October 2026 benchmark, 88% of 3,000 people drawn at random from a US B2B dataset had the same company and the same title on LinkedIn (95% CI: 86% to 89%), and 93% the same current company. 3% of their LinkedIn URLs no longer worked.

How fast does B2B data go out of date?

In the same benchmark, people whose profile was updated 90 to 180 days before the snapshot had the same company and title on LinkedIn 92% of the time; those updated 180 days or more before, 53%.

How was it measured?

3,000 people drawn at random from the 50M+ US file, each looked up by LinkedIn URL on 2026-10-08 through a LinkedIn profile API that fetches the profile from LinkedIn again when its copy is stale. A match is the same current company and the same title once both are normalized (case, punctuation, accents).

Can I reuse these numbers?

Yes, under CC BY 4.0, citing datacircle.dev. Every number is on GitHub as CSV: https://github.com/waynehamadi/datacircle.

Sign up at datacircle.dev with your work email: a $5 credit, that's 4,000 LinkedIn profiles at $1.25 per 1,000. Free: 10M+ U.S. B2B leads, as a flat file. Download it at datacircle.dev.

Sign up